Skip to content
Signalcrest
← Back to entity feed
hardwareentity · corroborated across sources

cortexa9

for embedded engineers

Steady

27

signal score

as of 3d ago

1

live items

Cooling

7-day est. ~17

lobsters

Why this scored 27

every term, weighted
Velocity+5.3 / 40 max

Its fastest-moving item, measured against the pace of its own source

Acceleration+13.5 / 25 max

Whether that velocity is itself speeding up, as a per-hour rate

Cross-source spread+0.0 / 25 max

How many independent communities its own items come from

Recency+9.1 / 10 max

Decays to zero over 14 days, counted from when we first saw it

Saturation penalty0.9 / 30 max

Subtracted once something is big and old — sized by its biggest item, aged from when we first saw it

Composite27.1

Weights are hand-tuned, not learned — we're calibrating them against realized trends as history accumulates. On an entity's first sighting there's no previous reading to compare against, so acceleration starts from a neutral prior rather than a measurement, and velocity falls back to engagement over its whole lifetime until a second reading exists. Full methodology

Outlook

low confidence · estimate, not a guarantee

7-day

~17

range 029

14-day

~5

range 019

30-day

~0

range 00

Signal history

7-day window (free)

— — projected trajectory (estimate, not a guarantee)

The evidence

The live items this entity's score aggregates — every community independently talking about it right now. This is the corroboration, shown, not claimed.

  1. 127

    Why aren't my two Cortex-A9 cores cache coherent?

    Cache incoherence between Cortex-A9 cores can limit multi-core performance. — for embedded engineers

    lobstershardwareSteady4d ago