Skip to content
Signalcrest
← Back to feed
cryptoforumscrypto

Should ArbitrumDAO Reward Non-Voting Governance Contributors?

Debates rewarding non-voting contributors in Arbitrum governance.

Heating

46

signal score

as of 6d ago

Too early

trajectory — needs a few more snapshots

Why this scored 46

every term, weighted
Velocity+13.3 / 40 max

Engagement gained per hour since the last capture, against the fastest item on its own source

Acceleration+23.2 / 25 max

Whether that velocity is itself speeding up, as a per-hour rate

Cross-source spread+0.0 / 25 max

How many independent communities are talking about the same entity

Recency+9.8 / 10 max

Decays to zero over 14 days

Saturation penalty0.0 / 30 max

Subtracted once something is big and old — we rank what's next, not what's peaked

Composite46.3

Weights are hand-tuned, not learned — we're calibrating them against realized trends as history accumulates. On a topic's first sighting there's no previous reading to compare against, so acceleration starts from a neutral prior rather than a measurement, and velocity falls back to engagement over its whole lifetime until a second reading exists. Full methodology

Signal history

7-day window (free)

Entities

arbitrumdao
Embed a live signal badge
Signalcrest signal badge
[![Signalcrest signal](https://www.signalcrest.app/api/badge/cgov%3Aarbgov%3A31248)](https://www.signalcrest.app/topic/cgov%3Aarbgov%3A31248)

Drop this in a README or blog post — it updates automatically as the score moves.