Signalcrest
← Back to feed
hackernewsai

A $500 RL fine-tune of a 9B open model beat frontier models on catalog review

Fine-tuned model beats frontier models

Steady

13

signal score

🔗 2

sources · rl

Cooling

7-day est. ~2

Why this scored 13

every term, weighted
Velocity+4.5 / 40 max

Engagement per hour, normalized against the fastest item on its own source

Acceleration+0.0 / 25 max

Whether that velocity is itself speeding up, as a per-hour rate

Cross-source spread+2.8 / 25 max

How many independent communities are talking about the same entity

Recency+8.4 / 10 max

Decays to zero over 14 days

Saturation penalty2.4 / 30 max

Subtracted once something is big and old — we rank what's next, not what's peaked

Composite13.3

Weights are hand-tuned, not learned — we're calibrating them against realized trends as history accumulates. On a topic's first sighting there's no previous reading to compare against, so acceleration starts from a neutral prior rather than a measurement. Full methodology

Outlook

low confidence · estimate, not a guarantee

7-day

~2

range 03

14-day

~0

range 00

30-day

~0

range 00

Signal history

7-day window (free)

— — projected trajectory (estimate, not a guarantee)

Entities

rl
Embed a live signal badge
Signalcrest signal badge
[![Signalcrest signal](https://www.signalcrest.app/api/badge/hn%3A49078454)](https://www.signalcrest.app/topic/hn%3A49078454)

Drop this in a README or blog post — it updates automatically as the score moves.