Signalcrest
← Back to feed
hackernewsai

GPT-5.6 vs. Claude Fable 5 for Physical AI, which performs best?

AI models compared

Steady

17

signal score

as of 1d ago

🔗 5

sources · claude

Steady

7-day est. ~19

Why this scored 17

every term, weighted
Velocity+0.9 / 40 max

Engagement per hour, normalized against the fastest item on its own source

Acceleration+0.0 / 25 max

Whether that velocity is itself speeding up, as a per-hour rate

Cross-source spread+11.1 / 25 max

How many independent communities are talking about the same entity

Recency+7.9 / 10 max

Decays to zero over 14 days

Saturation penalty2.6 / 30 max

Subtracted once something is big and old — we rank what's next, not what's peaked

Composite17.3

Weights are hand-tuned, not learned — we're calibrating them against realized trends as history accumulates. On a topic's first sighting there's no previous reading to compare against, so acceleration starts from a neutral prior rather than a measurement. Full methodology

Outlook

low confidence · estimate, not a guarantee

7-day

~19

range 1819

14-day

~19

range 1820

30-day

~19

range 1720

Signal history

7-day window (free)

— — projected trajectory (estimate, not a guarantee)

Entities

gptclaude
Embed a live signal badge
Signalcrest signal badge
[![Signalcrest signal](https://www.signalcrest.app/api/badge/hn%3A49098388)](https://www.signalcrest.app/topic/hn%3A49098388)

Drop this in a README or blog post — it updates automatically as the score moves.