Skip to content
Signalcrest
Back to feed
hackernewsai

OpenAI might have stolen another major proof

Alleged proof theft raises IP and trust concerns for AI research community.

Steady
Signal score
34
Sources
3
agreeing on openai
Trajectory
Steady
7-day est. ~25

Why this scored 34

every term, weighted
Velocity+0.0 / 40

Engagement gained per hour since the last capture, against the fastest item on its own source

Acceleration+10.9 / 25

Whether that velocity is itself speeding up, as a per-hour rate

Cross-source spread+16.7 / 25

How many independent communities are talking about the same entity

Recency+8.5 / 10

Decays to zero over 14 days

Saturation penalty2.3 / 30

Subtracted once something is big and old — we rank what's next, not what's peaked

Composite33.7

Weights are hand-tuned, not learned — we're calibrating them against realized trends as history accumulates. On a topic's first sighting there's no previous reading to compare against, so acceleration starts from a neutral prior rather than a measurement, and velocity falls back to engagement over its whole lifetime until a second reading exists. Full methodology

Outlook

low confidence · estimate, not a guarantee

7-day

~25

range 037

14-day

~19

range 033

30-day

~3

range 022

Signal history

7-day window (free)
2286

projected trajectory (estimate, not a guarantee)

Entities

openai
Embed a live signal badge
Signalcrest signal badge
[![Signalcrest signal](https://www.signalcrest.app/api/badge/hn%3A49638353)](https://www.signalcrest.app/topic/hn%3A49638353)

Drop this in a README or blog post — it updates automatically as the score moves.