Skip to content
Signalcrest
Back to feed
lobstersother

“No AI” Statements Are Much More Than Mere Statements

AI statement implications

Steady
Signal score
17
as of 50d ago
Trajectory
Too early
needs a few more snapshots

Why this scored 17

every term, weighted
Velocity+8.2 / 40

Engagement gained per hour since the last capture, against the fastest item on its own source

Acceleration+0.3 / 25

Whether that velocity is itself speeding up, as a per-hour rate

Cross-source spread+0.0 / 25

How many independent communities are talking about the same entity

Recency+9.0 / 10

Decays to zero over 14 days

Saturation penalty0.9 / 30

Subtracted once something is big and old — we rank what's next, not what's peaked

Composite16.6

Weights are hand-tuned, not learned — we're calibrating them against realized trends as history accumulates. On a topic's first sighting there's no previous reading to compare against, so acceleration starts from a neutral prior rather than a measurement, and velocity falls back to engagement over its whole lifetime until a second reading exists. Full methodology

Signal history

7-day window (free)
Not enough history yet — the trend line fills in as snapshots accrue (every 30 min).
Embed a live signal badge
Signalcrest signal badge
[![Signalcrest signal](https://www.signalcrest.app/api/badge/lob%3Aqozazh)](https://www.signalcrest.app/topic/lob%3Aqozazh)

Drop this in a README or blog post — it updates automatically as the score moves.