Skip to content
Signalcrest
← Back to feed
stackoverflowdevtools

Are @PlanningPin entities excluded from inverse/custom shadow variable calculation?

Clarifies whether PlanningPin entities are ignored in custom shadow variable calculations in Timefold.

Steady

16

signal score

as of 4d ago

Cooling

7-day est. ~3

Why this scored 16

every term, weighted
Velocity+0.0 / 40 max

Engagement gained per hour since the last capture, against the fastest item on its own source

Acceleration+12.0 / 25 max

Whether that velocity is itself speeding up, as a per-hour rate

Cross-source spread+0.0 / 25 max

How many independent communities are talking about the same entity

Recency+5.0 / 10 max

Decays to zero over 14 days

Saturation penalty1.2 / 30 max

Subtracted once something is big and old — we rank what's next, not what's peaked

Composite15.8

Weights are hand-tuned, not learned — we're calibrating them against realized trends as history accumulates. On a topic's first sighting there's no previous reading to compare against, so acceleration starts from a neutral prior rather than a measurement, and velocity falls back to engagement over its whole lifetime until a second reading exists. Full methodology

Outlook

low confidence · estimate, not a guarantee

7-day

~3

range 015

14-day

~0

range 04

30-day

~0

range 00

Signal history

7-day window (free)

— — projected trajectory (estimate, not a guarantee)

Entities

timefold
Embed a live signal badge
Signalcrest signal badge
[![Signalcrest signal](https://www.signalcrest.app/api/badge/so%3A79995515)](https://www.signalcrest.app/topic/so%3A79995515)

Drop this in a README or blog post — it updates automatically as the score moves.